403Webshell
Server IP : 160.187.147.141  /  Your IP : 216.73.216.229
Web Server : nginx/1.28.0
System : Linux inter3 6.8.0-63-generic #66-Ubuntu SMP PREEMPT_DYNAMIC Fri Jun 13 20:25:30 UTC 2025 x86_64
User : butparkerkhactencom ( 1005)
PHP Version : 8.4.8
Disable Function : NONE
MySQL : OFF  |  cURL : ON  |  WGET : ON  |  Perl : ON  |  Python : OFF  |  Sudo : ON  |  Pkexec : OFF
Directory :  /usr/share/doc/debianutils/

Upload File :
current_dir [ Writeable ] document_root [ Writeable ]

 

Command :


[ Back ]     

Current File : /usr/share/doc/debianutils/README.shells
/etc/shells micropolicy

The expected audience of this is debian developers packaging programs
meant to be used as login shells.

/etc/shells is no longer a config file, but is maintained by the
add-shell, remove-shell and update-shells programs.  So, if a
package contains something that the maintainer thinks ought to be a
valid login shell, it can have its shell included in two different way.

By placing a fragment in /usr/share/debianutils/shells.d/<binarypackage>,
it will invoke a file trigger on debian-utils and invoke update-shells,
which will add and remove the contained shells from /etc/shells as
needed.

Alternatively, it's postinst should, (on initial install only, to allow a
sysadmin to take it out again), run:

/usr/sbin/add-shell /path/to/shell

In the postrm, probably on remove, the package should call

/usr/sbin/remove-shell /path/to/shell

The latter method has the disadvantage of shells disappearing from /etc/shells
when the relevant package is removed but not purged and then reinstalled. The
fragment method does not suffer from this limitation.

Youez - 2016 - github.com/yon3zu
LinuXploit